To add perspective to inequality as we experience it in the modern world, it might be useful to consider what our paleolithic ancestors would have contended with, had they experienced that same inequality.
We’ll use the same inequality ratios, based on percentage of group wealth held by individuals in the United States at present, to inform our calculations.
We will think of ‘wealth’, in paleolithic terms, as materials required for living. This basically begins and ends with food and water – but we will add a few other commodities, just to boost the parallel to modern times. We’ll assume that in addition to food, each member of a paleolithic human community would possess two skins at any given time – one for wearing, for environmental protection, and one for warmth while sleeping; one spear or other weapon, for hunting or personal defense against predators; and one stone tool kit, for fashioning weapons and making clothing, preparing food, etc.
For diet, we’ll generously apportion annual individual and tribal requirements based on assumed need for high caloric replacement, balanced against body mass lower than our own, as follows:
Individual (per year):
150 pounds of meat
300 pounds of plants
350 gallons of water
Assuming a tribe of 100 (for simplicity; the actual tribal population would probably have been somewhat higher)...
Tribe (per year):
15,000 pounds of meat
30,000 pounds of plants
35,000 gallons of water
Again, shooting for simplicity, make generous guesses on the longevity of non-ingested commodities. Figure an individual’s consumption of these as follows:
Individual (per year):
6 skins
3 spears/weapons
1 stone tool kit (figure they last a year; they’re made of stone)
Tribe (per year):
600 skins
300 spears/weapons
100 stone tool kits
In paleolithic community, of course, this wealth is equally distributed. Everybody gets their day’s calories and water; everybody has their own set of survival tools. Some might have different tools than others; some might use skins for different purposes. But the distribution is the same.
What would all this look like if our present-day oligarchy-driven wealth ratios were imposed on that paleo tribe?
Richest to poorest | MEAT (in pounds) | VEGGIES (in pounds) | WATER (in gallons) | SKINS (each) | WEAPONS (each) | TOOL KITS (each)
|
1 | 6,450 | 12,900 | 15,050 | 258 | 129 | 43 |
4 | 4,350 | 8,700 | 10,150 | 174 | 87 | 29 |
5 | 1,650 | 3,300 | 3,850 | 66 | 33 | 11 |
10 | 1,500 | 3,000 | 3,500 | 60 | 30 | 10 |
20 | 1,050 | 2,100 | 2,450 | 42 | 21 | 7 |
60 | 45 | 90 | 105 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
Viewed through the paleo lens, the top oligarch’s level of wealth here would be, of course, obscene. No human being could possibly make use of such excess, and the portion of tribal wealth taken from the lowest tier would likely cost them their lives; the second-lowest tier would be badly weakened; and the remaining 20 healthy members of the tribe could not sustain it.
This is all silly, of course; the accumulation of wealth was impossible back then, and it would never have occurred to any member of the tribe to try to get away with such theft.
Let’s reset the numbers, assuming baseline subsistence wealth at the lowest tier, then extrapolating by wealth distribution ratios to see where the other numbers go:
Richest to poorest | MEAT (in pounds) | VEGGIES (in pounds) | WATER (in gallons) | SKINS (each) | WEAPONS (each) | TOOL KITS (each)
|
1 | 915,900 | 1,831,800 | 2,137,100 | 36,636 | 18,318 | 6,106 |
4 | 416,295 | 832,590 | 971,355 | 16,652 | 8,326 | 2,775 |
5 | 59,895 | 120,780 | 139,755 | 2,415 | 1,198 | 400 |
10 | 49,500 | 99,000 | 115,500 | 1,980 | 990 | 330 |
20 | 24,465 | 48,930 | 57,085 | 140 | 70 | 23 |
60 | 150 | 300 | 350 | 6 | 3 | 1 |
We are well and truly off the deep end at this point, of course; the introduction of a social safety net to ensure that the poorest members of the tribe obtain the minimal requirements for survival is as inconceivable as a tribe of 100 coming up with such staggering means of production.
But our basic point has been made: the numbers are obscene. It is the staggering percentages of distribution that are the horrifying part.
Comments